Comments on the last issue

rule

mandala

Thumbs up

W e've received the latest issue of Collaboration. It is an excellent issue.
-- Eric Hughes, Matagiri, Mt. Tremper, New York


The new Collaboration is very well done, both in print and on the Web -- congrats!

-- Kenny Schachat, kennys@netcom14.netcom.com


I have just visited the Collaboration Web page. It is a beautiful publication, and the Web page is a treat to read.

-- Ameeta Mehra, ameeta@giasdl01.vsnl.net.in


Was delighted to receive the latest Collaboration, surprised to see which photos and drawings of mine the designer chose to use, and pleased with the content, layout, and size of the whole issue! It seems to get better all the time. And it warmed my being to be communicating in the presence of so many folks I know. It was a few hours -- overnight -- before I received my first response to my articles from a friend whom I have not seen or heard of for four or five years, and who had been at Baca and Phoenicia with me; so we have begun correspondence.

Needless to say, it made my day to receive this issue. I am elated at joining in the national network and having an audience for more. Thanks to you for all your help and counsel along the way!

-- Paul Edmonston, edmonart@aol.com


Just got a call yesterday asking about Collaboration; thrilled to get it in today's mail. An excellent issue all around. Truly! Pranams for all your great work.

-- Julian Lines, jhl@aol.com


The last issue of Collaboration is composed thoughtfully and artistically. And it also brought happy memories of AUM.

-- Hansa Sehgal, Chicago, Illinois


Compiler error

T he AUM '97 conference reported on pages 10 and 11 of the "Current affairs" section in the last Collaboration doesn't seem to be properly compiled (confined to just four participants and their impressions with no coordinated overview . . . leaving a lot left unsaid!). The AUM conference deserves better reporting!
-- Man Ravikant


Businesses are not centers

With yet appreciation for the goodwill which prompted you to list our Auromere business under the "Centers" listings in your Fall 1997 issue, I feel it is inappropriate to list businesses under this heading. If there is interest, perhaps you could list businesses and other kinds of organizations connected with Sri Aurobindo's yoga separately from the centers.

Thanks otherwise for a superb issue.

-- Dakshina, Auromere, Lodi, California

Contents || Top || editor@collaboration.org